<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BSD Aims to Bring Specs to BIM—With New Leaders And Capital Injection	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://architosh.com/2017/09/bsd-aims-to-bring-specs-to-bim-with-new-leaders-and-capital-injection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://architosh.com/2017/09/bsd-aims-to-bring-specs-to-bim-with-new-leaders-and-capital-injection/</link>
	<description>architosh™ — a global-leading CAD / 3D / AEC industry technology publication and #1 source for Mac and iOS users in these segments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:20:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2017/09/bsd-aims-to-bring-specs-to-bim-with-new-leaders-and-capital-injection/#comment-55480</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=25067#comment-55480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[m68k - thanks for these valuable comments. I agree with you that in the schematic and planning phases individual products are rarely known entities and hence property values associated with actual products are of limited use. However, once products are clearly defined and/or known, the link between BIM and specification becomes clearly important.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m68k &#8211; thanks for these valuable comments. I agree with you that in the schematic and planning phases individual products are rarely known entities and hence property values associated with actual products are of limited use. However, once products are clearly defined and/or known, the link between BIM and specification becomes clearly important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2017/09/bsd-aims-to-bring-specs-to-bim-with-new-leaders-and-capital-injection/#comment-56363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=25067#comment-56363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[m68k - thanks for these valuable comments. I agree with you that in the schematic and planning phases individual products are rarely known entities and hence property values associated with actual products are of limited use. However, once products are clearly defined and/or known, the link between BIM and specification becomes clearly important.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m68k &#8211; thanks for these valuable comments. I agree with you that in the schematic and planning phases individual products are rarely known entities and hence property values associated with actual products are of limited use. However, once products are clearly defined and/or known, the link between BIM and specification becomes clearly important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: m68k		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2017/09/bsd-aims-to-bring-specs-to-bim-with-new-leaders-and-capital-injection/#comment-55478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[m68k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=25067#comment-55478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As BIM-Manager in a mid-sized architecture firm in Germany I am still wondering why nobody addresses the fact, that there are no national or even global standards for building-element properties and propertyvalues. Without these there is no smart way the exchange informations or calculate costs. Product Properties are not useful in planing, as you are dealing with general requirements instead of defined products. In Europe it is even forbidden to name certain products. BIM is like the Jeopardy game show, but I don&#039;t know what the answer (propertyvalue) is or should be, I can&#039;t create the suitable question (quantity take off). That&#039;s the challenge, not what software or file format (AutoDesk marketing) to use.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As BIM-Manager in a mid-sized architecture firm in Germany I am still wondering why nobody addresses the fact, that there are no national or even global standards for building-element properties and propertyvalues. Without these there is no smart way the exchange informations or calculate costs. Product Properties are not useful in planing, as you are dealing with general requirements instead of defined products. In Europe it is even forbidden to name certain products. BIM is like the Jeopardy game show, but I don&#8217;t know what the answer (propertyvalue) is or should be, I can&#8217;t create the suitable question (quantity take off). That&#8217;s the challenge, not what software or file format (AutoDesk marketing) to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: m68k		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2017/09/bsd-aims-to-bring-specs-to-bim-with-new-leaders-and-capital-injection/#comment-56362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[m68k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=25067#comment-56362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As BIM-Manager in a mid-sized architecture firm in Germany I am still wondering why nobody addresses the fact, that there are no national or even global standards for building-element properties and propertyvalues. Without these there is no smart way the exchange informations or calculate costs. Product Properties are not useful in planing, as you are dealing with general requirements instead of defined products. In Europe it is even forbidden to name certain products. BIM is like the Jeopardy game show, but I don&#039;t know what the answer (propertyvalue) is or should be, I can&#039;t create the suitable question (quantity take off). That&#039;s the challenge, not what software or file format (AutoDesk marketing) to use.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As BIM-Manager in a mid-sized architecture firm in Germany I am still wondering why nobody addresses the fact, that there are no national or even global standards for building-element properties and propertyvalues. Without these there is no smart way the exchange informations or calculate costs. Product Properties are not useful in planing, as you are dealing with general requirements instead of defined products. In Europe it is even forbidden to name certain products. BIM is like the Jeopardy game show, but I don&#8217;t know what the answer (propertyvalue) is or should be, I can&#8217;t create the suitable question (quantity take off). That&#8217;s the challenge, not what software or file format (AutoDesk marketing) to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
