<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The chip the new Mac Pro may have been waiting for is out and ready!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/</link>
	<description>architosh™ — a global-leading CAD / 3D / AEC industry technology publication and #1 source for Mac and iOS users in these segments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Se Jobs non riuscita due volte, perché avrebbe Ives &#38; Team avere successo? RIP nuovo Mac Pro &#124; Informazioni sul BIM in Italia		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54599</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Se Jobs non riuscita due volte, perché avrebbe Ives &#38; Team avere successo? RIP nuovo Mac Pro &#124; Informazioni sul BIM in Italia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] nuovo processo di chip di litografia cambia ridursi chip in meno pacchetti assetati di potere) .  All&#8217;inizio di quest&#8217;anno , che è quello che è [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] nuovo processo di chip di litografia cambia ridursi chip in meno pacchetti assetati di potere) .  All&#8217;inizio di quest&#8217;anno , che è quello che è [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: shameermulji		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shameermulji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 03:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Apple’s latest faux pas that it may be about to rebrand OS X as MacOS isn’t—in this author’s view—simply for consistent naming reasons.&quot;

Definitely look forward to your reasons regarding Apple&#039;s potential rebranding of OSX to MacOS / macOS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apple’s latest faux pas that it may be about to rebrand OS X as MacOS isn’t—in this author’s view—simply for consistent naming reasons.&#8221;</p>
<p>Definitely look forward to your reasons regarding Apple&#8217;s potential rebranding of OSX to MacOS / macOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: shameermulji		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-56665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shameermulji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-56665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Apple&#039;s latest faux pas that it may be about to rebrand OS X as MacOS isn&#039;t&#8212;in this author&#039;s view&#8212;simply for consistent naming reasons.&quot;

Definitely look forward to your reasons regarding Apple&#039;s potential rebranding of OSX to MacOS / macOS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apple&#8217;s latest faux pas that it may be about to rebrand OS X as MacOS isn&#8217;t&#8212;in this author&#8217;s view&#8212;simply for consistent naming reasons.&#8221;</p>
<p>Definitely look forward to your reasons regarding Apple&#8217;s potential rebranding of OSX to MacOS / macOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nicolas - GPU rendering is great stuff, no doubt. Yet, despite this, mainline software CAD and 3D developers with older CPU-oriented software have been slow to embrace GPU rendering. Big architectural changes take years to implement often and ISVs want to focus on new features in a competitive market. 

However, Apple at WWDC sessions focused on the graphics have touted three core options for developers: (1) CPU rendering (2) GPU rendering and (3) mixed CPU and GPU rendering. Both OpenGL and OpenCL have been touted as mixed and flexible paths for acceleration so developers have options. Now we have Apple Metal and this is indeed promising for some developers. Most CAD developers will remain with OpenGL for quite some time. Platform specific graphics APIs may be integrated into predominantly OpenGL based apps. Not supporting Vulkan seems foolish as it again provides more options for developers to target OS X along with Windows, Linux and other platforms. Why not provide many roads to the golden city?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicolas &#8211; GPU rendering is great stuff, no doubt. Yet, despite this, mainline software CAD and 3D developers with older CPU-oriented software have been slow to embrace GPU rendering. Big architectural changes take years to implement often and ISVs want to focus on new features in a competitive market. </p>
<p>However, Apple at WWDC sessions focused on the graphics have touted three core options for developers: (1) CPU rendering (2) GPU rendering and (3) mixed CPU and GPU rendering. Both OpenGL and OpenCL have been touted as mixed and flexible paths for acceleration so developers have options. Now we have Apple Metal and this is indeed promising for some developers. Most CAD developers will remain with OpenGL for quite some time. Platform specific graphics APIs may be integrated into predominantly OpenGL based apps. Not supporting Vulkan seems foolish as it again provides more options for developers to target OS X along with Windows, Linux and other platforms. Why not provide many roads to the golden city?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-60633</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-60633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Javier - you are absolutely right. And Music is just one of the major areas the new Mac Pro really let down a whole bunch of people. It almost seems like the team responsible for designing the new Mac Pro didn&#039;t go around and actually talk to the Mac Pro customers using the older systems. If they did, they would have learned that &quot;pros&quot; need first and foremost, &quot;flexibility.&quot; It&#039;s true they would have heard they need &quot;workstation&quot; GPUs...and we got those. And we got several gradients. That part was awesome. But why the rigidity of a system design where one gets locked into 2 GPUs and locked out of 2 CPUs? 

This mystery has never been solved. It is as if Apple was planning something else but never delivered it. Something that would have made the new Mac Pro make sense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Javier &#8211; you are absolutely right. And Music is just one of the major areas the new Mac Pro really let down a whole bunch of people. It almost seems like the team responsible for designing the new Mac Pro didn&#8217;t go around and actually talk to the Mac Pro customers using the older systems. If they did, they would have learned that &#8220;pros&#8221; need first and foremost, &#8220;flexibility.&#8221; It&#8217;s true they would have heard they need &#8220;workstation&#8221; GPUs&#8230;and we got those. And we got several gradients. That part was awesome. But why the rigidity of a system design where one gets locked into 2 GPUs and locked out of 2 CPUs? </p>
<p>This mystery has never been solved. It is as if Apple was planning something else but never delivered it. Something that would have made the new Mac Pro make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Javier - you are absolutely right. And Music is just one of the major areas the new Mac Pro really let down a whole bunch of people. It almost seems like the team responsible for designing the new Mac Pro didn&#039;t go around and actually talk to the Mac Pro customers using the older systems. If they did, they would have learned that &quot;pros&quot; need first and foremost, &quot;flexibility.&quot; It&#039;s true they would have heard they need &quot;workstation&quot; GPUs...and we got those. And we got several gradients. That part was awesome. But why the rigidity of a system design where one gets locked into 2 GPUs and locked out of 2 CPUs? 

This mystery has never been solved. It is as if Apple was planning something else but never delivered it. Something that would have made the new Mac Pro make sense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Javier &#8211; you are absolutely right. And Music is just one of the major areas the new Mac Pro really let down a whole bunch of people. It almost seems like the team responsible for designing the new Mac Pro didn&#8217;t go around and actually talk to the Mac Pro customers using the older systems. If they did, they would have learned that &#8220;pros&#8221; need first and foremost, &#8220;flexibility.&#8221; It&#8217;s true they would have heard they need &#8220;workstation&#8221; GPUs&#8230;and we got those. And we got several gradients. That part was awesome. But why the rigidity of a system design where one gets locked into 2 GPUs and locked out of 2 CPUs? </p>
<p>This mystery has never been solved. It is as if Apple was planning something else but never delivered it. Something that would have made the new Mac Pro make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-60630</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-60630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nicolas - GPU rendering is great stuff, no doubt. Yet, despite this, mainline software CAD and 3D developers with older CPU-oriented software have been slow to embrace GPU rendering. Big architectural changes take years to implement often and ISVs want to focus on new features in a competitive market. 

However, Apple at WWDC sessions focused on the graphics have touted three core options for developers: (1) CPU rendering (2) GPU rendering and (3) mixed CPU and GPU rendering. Both OpenGL and OpenCL have been touted as mixed and flexible paths for acceleration so developers have options. Now we have Apple Metal and this is indeed promising for some developers. Most CAD developers will remain with OpenGL for quite some time. Platform specific graphics APIs may be integrated into predominantly OpenGL based apps. Not supporting Vulkan seems foolish as it again provides more options for developers to target OS X along with Windows, Linux and other platforms. Why not provide many roads to the golden city?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicolas &#8211; GPU rendering is great stuff, no doubt. Yet, despite this, mainline software CAD and 3D developers with older CPU-oriented software have been slow to embrace GPU rendering. Big architectural changes take years to implement often and ISVs want to focus on new features in a competitive market. </p>
<p>However, Apple at WWDC sessions focused on the graphics have touted three core options for developers: (1) CPU rendering (2) GPU rendering and (3) mixed CPU and GPU rendering. Both OpenGL and OpenCL have been touted as mixed and flexible paths for acceleration so developers have options. Now we have Apple Metal and this is indeed promising for some developers. Most CAD developers will remain with OpenGL for quite some time. Platform specific graphics APIs may be integrated into predominantly OpenGL based apps. Not supporting Vulkan seems foolish as it again provides more options for developers to target OS X along with Windows, Linux and other platforms. Why not provide many roads to the golden city?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nicolas Miard		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolas Miard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Anthony

I understand what you mean, and I understand that a professional user can&#039;t change it&#039;s entire methods to leave a software that don&#039;t embrace newer technologies like OpenCL, but still, I think GPGPU rendering is the way to go, and even if CUDA is currently the best choice, OpenCL could be good too (and Vulkan next?). 
It needs support, and a growing demand should help. The rendering engine Cycles is planed to be a (free) software on its own, and when it happens, I hope that there will be a lot of Cycles plugins around, for most of the 3D/CAD softwares out there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anthony</p>
<p>I understand what you mean, and I understand that a professional user can&#8217;t change it&#8217;s entire methods to leave a software that don&#8217;t embrace newer technologies like OpenCL, but still, I think GPGPU rendering is the way to go, and even if CUDA is currently the best choice, OpenCL could be good too (and Vulkan next?).<br />
It needs support, and a growing demand should help. The rendering engine Cycles is planed to be a (free) software on its own, and when it happens, I hope that there will be a lot of Cycles plugins around, for most of the 3D/CAD softwares out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Javier Laguna Inzolia		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Javier Laguna Inzolia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a music composer I am sad that Apple in this last Mac Pro design, never thought about the music industry in a manner of having the option of a Mac Pro more focused for Music studios and music composers and producers. What I am trying to say is that most of us don&#039;t need a second GPU in our system, however we do require more than 4 cores in our system as we relay on real time processing more than offline processing. Additionally we demand more than 32 gb of ram offered in the iMac. When working with 60 or more tracks of VSTi&#039;s and DSP processing an 8 core or 12 core machine does the job. I believe If Apple offers a powerful Mac Pro with a single GPU and maybe an extra SSD for music the music industry, Apple could increase their sales by a good percentage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a music composer I am sad that Apple in this last Mac Pro design, never thought about the music industry in a manner of having the option of a Mac Pro more focused for Music studios and music composers and producers. What I am trying to say is that most of us don&#8217;t need a second GPU in our system, however we do require more than 4 cores in our system as we relay on real time processing more than offline processing. Additionally we demand more than 32 gb of ram offered in the iMac. When working with 60 or more tracks of VSTi&#8217;s and DSP processing an 8 core or 12 core machine does the job. I believe If Apple offers a powerful Mac Pro with a single GPU and maybe an extra SSD for music the music industry, Apple could increase their sales by a good percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nicolas Miard		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-59764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicolas Miard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-59764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Anthony

I understand what you mean, and I understand that a professional user can&#039;t change it&#039;s entire methods to leave a software that don&#039;t embrace newer technologies like OpenCL, but still, I think GPGPU rendering is the way to go, and even if CUDA is currently the best choice, OpenCL could be good too (and Vulkan next?). 
It needs support, and a growing demand should help. The rendering engine Cycles is planed to be a (free) software on its own, and when it happens, I hope that there will be a lot of Cycles plugins around, for most of the 3D/CAD softwares out there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anthony</p>
<p>I understand what you mean, and I understand that a professional user can&#8217;t change it&#8217;s entire methods to leave a software that don&#8217;t embrace newer technologies like OpenCL, but still, I think GPGPU rendering is the way to go, and even if CUDA is currently the best choice, OpenCL could be good too (and Vulkan next?).<br />
It needs support, and a growing demand should help. The rendering engine Cycles is planed to be a (free) software on its own, and when it happens, I hope that there will be a lot of Cycles plugins around, for most of the 3D/CAD softwares out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Javier Laguna Inzolia		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-60631</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Javier Laguna Inzolia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-60631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a music composer I am sad that Apple in this last Mac Pro design, never thought about the music industry in a manner of having the option of a Mac Pro more focused for Music studios and music composers and producers. What I am trying to say is that most of us don&#039;t need a second GPU in our system, however we do require more than 4 cores in our system as we relay on real time processing more than offline processing. Additionally we demand more than 32 gb of ram offered in the iMac. When working with 60 or more tracks of VSTi&#039;s and DSP processing an 8 core or 12 core machine does the job. I believe If Apple offers a powerful Mac Pro with a single GPU and maybe an extra SSD for music the music industry, Apple could increase their sales by a good percentage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a music composer I am sad that Apple in this last Mac Pro design, never thought about the music industry in a manner of having the option of a Mac Pro more focused for Music studios and music composers and producers. What I am trying to say is that most of us don&#8217;t need a second GPU in our system, however we do require more than 4 cores in our system as we relay on real time processing more than offline processing. Additionally we demand more than 32 gb of ram offered in the iMac. When working with 60 or more tracks of VSTi&#8217;s and DSP processing an 8 core or 12 core machine does the job. I believe If Apple offers a powerful Mac Pro with a single GPU and maybe an extra SSD for music the music industry, Apple could increase their sales by a good percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Kira - many would agree with you. It&#039;s why HP in particular has gone after Mac Pro users. But their problem is those users really, really don&#039;t want Windows. This is, ultimately, a ridiculously stupid situation that Apple has allowed itself to get into...with the likes of HP hunting directly for their users.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kira &#8211; many would agree with you. It&#8217;s why HP in particular has gone after Mac Pro users. But their problem is those users really, really don&#8217;t want Windows. This is, ultimately, a ridiculously stupid situation that Apple has allowed itself to get into&#8230;with the likes of HP hunting directly for their users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Kira - many would agree with you. It&#039;s why HP in particular has gone after Mac Pro users. But their problem is those users really, really don&#039;t want Windows. This is, ultimately, a ridiculously stupid situation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kira &#8211; many would agree with you. It&#8217;s why HP in particular has gone after Mac Pro users. But their problem is those users really, really don&#8217;t want Windows. This is, ultimately, a ridiculously stupid situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-58940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-58940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also Nicolas, &quot;types&quot; of AEC users might logically be split into: (a) dominant single-threaded app users, (b) mixed single/multiple threaded app users, and (c) dominant multi-threaded app users. 

If a construction professional models process workflows and field conditions in SketchUp all day long, she can do that well on a MacBook Pro where 4 fast cores are well suited for that single-threaded app. 

If an architect using Revit most of the time but also doing rendering in say Artlantis, Vray or C4D, they are the type (b) user and so the Mac Pro, particularly with the latest new chips, is a good investment. For the type (c) user who maybe a dedicated film or VFX artists, the current Mac Pro is &quot;under-cored&quot; for a good percentage of these professionals. Likewise, the machine is wrong for building out high-core render farms...too expensive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Nicolas, &#8220;types&#8221; of AEC users might logically be split into: (a) dominant single-threaded app users, (b) mixed single/multiple threaded app users, and (c) dominant multi-threaded app users. </p>
<p>If a construction professional models process workflows and field conditions in SketchUp all day long, she can do that well on a MacBook Pro where 4 fast cores are well suited for that single-threaded app. </p>
<p>If an architect using Revit most of the time but also doing rendering in say Artlantis, Vray or C4D, they are the type (b) user and so the Mac Pro, particularly with the latest new chips, is a good investment. For the type (c) user who maybe a dedicated film or VFX artists, the current Mac Pro is &#8220;under-cored&#8221; for a good percentage of these professionals. Likewise, the machine is wrong for building out high-core render farms&#8230;too expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, LEED AP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also Nicolas, &quot;types&quot; of AEC users might logically be split into: (a) dominant single-threaded app users, (b) mixed single/multiple threaded app users, and (c) dominant multi-threaded app users. 

If a construction professional models process workflows and field conditions in SketchUp all day long, she can do that well on a MacBook Pro where 4 fast cores are well suited for that single-threaded app. 

If an architect using Revit most of the time but also doing rendering in say Artlantis, Vray or C4D, they are the type (b) user and so the Mac Pro, particularly with the latest new chips, is a good investment. For the type (c) user who maybe a dedicated film or VFX artists, the current Mac Pro is &quot;under-cored&quot; for a good percentage of these professionals. Likewise, the machine is wrong for building out high-core render farms...too expensive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Nicolas, &#8220;types&#8221; of AEC users might logically be split into: (a) dominant single-threaded app users, (b) mixed single/multiple threaded app users, and (c) dominant multi-threaded app users. </p>
<p>If a construction professional models process workflows and field conditions in SketchUp all day long, she can do that well on a MacBook Pro where 4 fast cores are well suited for that single-threaded app. </p>
<p>If an architect using Revit most of the time but also doing rendering in say Artlantis, Vray or C4D, they are the type (b) user and so the Mac Pro, particularly with the latest new chips, is a good investment. For the type (c) user who maybe a dedicated film or VFX artists, the current Mac Pro is &#8220;under-cored&#8221; for a good percentage of these professionals. Likewise, the machine is wrong for building out high-core render farms&#8230;too expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: architosh		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[architosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nicolas,  you are touching on the fact that leading AEC apps are lagging in multi-threading. So true.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicolas,  you are touching on the fact that leading AEC apps are lagging in multi-threading. So true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-58931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-58931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Kira - many would agree with you. It&#039;s why HP in particular has gone after Mac Pro users. But their problem is those users really, really don&#039;t want Windows. This is, ultimately, a ridiculously stupid situation that Apple has allowed itself to get into...with the likes of HP hunting directly for their users.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kira &#8211; many would agree with you. It&#8217;s why HP in particular has gone after Mac Pro users. But their problem is those users really, really don&#8217;t want Windows. This is, ultimately, a ridiculously stupid situation that Apple has allowed itself to get into&#8230;with the likes of HP hunting directly for their users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-58930</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo AIA, L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-58930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Kira - many would agree with you. It&#039;s why HP in particular has gone after Mac Pro users. But their problem is those users really, really don&#039;t want Windows. This is, ultimately, a ridiculously stupid situation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kira &#8211; many would agree with you. It&#8217;s why HP in particular has gone after Mac Pro users. But their problem is those users really, really don&#8217;t want Windows. This is, ultimately, a ridiculously stupid situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: architosh		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-58929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[architosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-58929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nicolas,  you are touching on the fact that leading AEC apps are lagging in multi-threading. So true.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicolas,  you are touching on the fact that leading AEC apps are lagging in multi-threading. So true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kira Kinski		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2016/04/the-chip-the-new-mac-pro-may-have-been-waiting-for-is-out-and-ready/#comment-54233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kira Kinski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=21175#comment-54233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Mac Pro needs far more than a new chip. Expandability for one, like the previous design. Do that and count me in. Ignore that and hello Hackintosh on my next purchase.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mac Pro needs far more than a new chip. Expandability for one, like the previous design. Do that and count me in. Ignore that and hello Hackintosh on my next purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
