<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tips for Running SolidWorks on your Mac	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://architosh.com/2009/01/tips-for-running-solidworks-on-your-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://architosh.com/2009/01/tips-for-running-solidworks-on-your-mac/</link>
	<description>architosh™ — a global-leading CAD / 3D / AEC industry technology publication and #1 source for Mac and iOS users in these segments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:34:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Fenn		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2009/01/tips-for-running-solidworks-on-your-mac/#comment-82</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Fenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=1414#comment-82</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t exactly &#039;news&#039; is it? I mean the link to the original article is also several months old now. It seems all very silly running SW&#039;s on what basically is a PC in Apple clothing (Bootcamp)? PC users who have never used OSX continually fail to understand that it isn&#039;t necessarily the Mac&#039;s great looks that make the system so desirable, but the Mac&#039;s operating system OSX! Therefore what we Mac users want is Solidworks, native, running in OSX!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t exactly &#8216;news&#8217; is it? I mean the link to the original article is also several months old now. It seems all very silly running SW&#8217;s on what basically is a PC in Apple clothing (Bootcamp)? PC users who have never used OSX continually fail to understand that it isn&#8217;t necessarily the Mac&#8217;s great looks that make the system so desirable, but the Mac&#8217;s operating system OSX! Therefore what we Mac users want is Solidworks, native, running in OSX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Fenn		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2009/01/tips-for-running-solidworks-on-your-mac/#comment-56244</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Fenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://architosh.com/?p=1414#comment-56244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t exactly &#039;news&#039; is it? I mean the link to the original article is also several months old now. It seems all very silly running SW&#039;s on what basically is a PC in Apple clothing (Bootcamp)? PC users who have never used OSX continually fail to understand that it isn&#039;t necessarily the Mac&#039;s great looks that make the system so desirable, but the Mac&#039;s operating system OSX! Therefore what we Mac users want is Solidworks, native, running in OSX!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t exactly &#8216;news&#8217; is it? I mean the link to the original article is also several months old now. It seems all very silly running SW&#8217;s on what basically is a PC in Apple clothing (Bootcamp)? PC users who have never used OSX continually fail to understand that it isn&#8217;t necessarily the Mac&#8217;s great looks that make the system so desirable, but the Mac&#8217;s operating system OSX! Therefore what we Mac users want is Solidworks, native, running in OSX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
