<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Autodesk announces 64-bit Revit Platform for BIM	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/</link>
	<description>architosh™ — a global-leading CAD / 3D / AEC industry technology publication and #1 source for Mac and iOS users in these segments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/#comment-21</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-21</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gary, Dennis Fukai&#039;s blog post is interesting. Clearly he is looking at BIM from one of the legitimate three sides (design/construct/own). His argument that ACAD&#039;s underlying modeling technology powers Revit today is likely wrong. If he is referring to modeling kernel technology (...and I can&#039;t tell if he is) then his later point about the marriage between CAD/CAM and its meaningful to building construction is an important point. Which is why i think some (eg: Randall Newton?) have written about SolidWorks in AEC (as in, what if there was a place for it?). In any case, he brings up many interesting facets about BIM as perceived from the CM side. Thanks for pointing out this post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, Dennis Fukai&#8217;s blog post is interesting. Clearly he is looking at BIM from one of the legitimate three sides (design/construct/own). His argument that ACAD&#8217;s underlying modeling technology powers Revit today is likely wrong. If he is referring to modeling kernel technology (&#8230;and I can&#8217;t tell if he is) then his later point about the marriage between CAD/CAM and its meaningful to building construction is an important point. Which is why i think some (eg: Randall Newton?) have written about SolidWorks in AEC (as in, what if there was a place for it?). In any case, he brings up many interesting facets about BIM as perceived from the CM side. Thanks for pointing out this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/#comment-20</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-20</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gary,

Not sure what may have happened with your post (first paragraph). But with our new site there is bound to be some minor bugs. We&#039;ve been finding them and addressing them ASAP so please elaborate so I can trouble-shoot this issue. Thanks.  - AFR]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p>
<p>Not sure what may have happened with your post (first paragraph). But with our new site there is bound to be some minor bugs. We&#8217;ve been finding them and addressing them ASAP so please elaborate so I can trouble-shoot this issue. Thanks.  &#8211; AFR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/#comment-58397</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-58397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gary,

Not sure what may have happened with your post (first paragraph). But with our new site there is bound to be some minor bugs. We&#039;ve been finding them and addressing them ASAP so please elaborate so I can trouble-shoot this issue. Thanks.  - AFR]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p>
<p>Not sure what may have happened with your post (first paragraph). But with our new site there is bound to be some minor bugs. We&#8217;ve been finding them and addressing them ASAP so please elaborate so I can trouble-shoot this issue. Thanks.  &#8211; AFR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/#comment-60086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Frausto-Robledo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-60086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gary,

Not sure what may have happened with your post (first paragraph). But with our new site there is bound to be some minor bugs. We&#039;ve been finding them and addressing them ASAP so please elaborate so I can trouble-shoot this issue. Thanks.  - AFR]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p>
<p>Not sure what may have happened with your post (first paragraph). But with our new site there is bound to be some minor bugs. We&#8217;ve been finding them and addressing them ASAP so please elaborate so I can trouble-shoot this issue. Thanks.  &#8211; AFR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: garydorn		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/#comment-16</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[garydorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-16</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[what happened to my first paragragh 

where I state the above quote is from 
http://insitebuilders.blogspot.com/2008/08/revit-vs-acad.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what happened to my first paragragh </p>
<p>where I state the above quote is from<br />
<a href="http://insitebuilders.blogspot.com/2008/08/revit-vs-acad.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://insitebuilders.blogspot.com/2008/08/revit-vs-acad.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: garydorn		</title>
		<link>https://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/#comment-15</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[garydorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-15</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot; BIM is not about 3D. BIM is about automatg info relationships using piece-based const models. For the const managers this means modelg both process and sequence as well as volume and sq footage.&quot;

Furthermore if Apple bought Autodesk then they would inheret REVIT - YUK]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; BIM is not about 3D. BIM is about automatg info relationships using piece-based const models. For the const managers this means modelg both process and sequence as well as volume and sq footage.&#8221;</p>
<p>Furthermore if Apple bought Autodesk then they would inheret REVIT &#8211; YUK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
