Comments on: Autodesk announces 64-bit Revit Platform for BIM http://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/ architoshâ„¢ — the leading Internet magazine dedicated to Mac CAD and 3D professionals and students worldwide. Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:11:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo http://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/comment-page-1/#comment-21 Anthony Frausto-Robledo Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:03:51 +0000 http://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-21 Gary, Dennis Fukai's blog post is interesting. Clearly he is looking at BIM from one of the legitimate three sides (design/construct/own). His argument that ACAD's underlying modeling technology powers Revit today is likely wrong. If he is referring to modeling kernel technology (...and I can't tell if he is) then his later point about the marriage between CAD/CAM and its meaningful to building construction is an important point. Which is why i think some (eg: Randall Newton?) have written about SolidWorks in AEC (as in, what if there was a place for it?). In any case, he brings up many interesting facets about BIM as perceived from the CM side. Thanks for pointing out this post. Gary, Dennis Fukai’s blog post is interesting. Clearly he is looking at BIM from one of the legitimate three sides (design/construct/own). His argument that ACAD’s underlying modeling technology powers Revit today is likely wrong. If he is referring to modeling kernel technology (…and I can’t tell if he is) then his later point about the marriage between CAD/CAM and its meaningful to building construction is an important point. Which is why i think some (eg: Randall Newton?) have written about SolidWorks in AEC (as in, what if there was a place for it?). In any case, he brings up many interesting facets about BIM as perceived from the CM side. Thanks for pointing out this post.

]]> By: Anthony Frausto-Robledo http://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Anthony Frausto-Robledo Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:51:20 +0000 http://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-20 Gary, Not sure what may have happened with your post (first paragraph). But with our new site there is bound to be some minor bugs. We've been finding them and addressing them ASAP so please elaborate so I can trouble-shoot this issue. Thanks. - AFR Gary,

Not sure what may have happened with your post (first paragraph). But with our new site there is bound to be some minor bugs. We’ve been finding them and addressing them ASAP so please elaborate so I can trouble-shoot this issue. Thanks. – AFR

]]> By: garydorn http://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/comment-page-1/#comment-16 garydorn Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:48:10 +0000 http://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-16 what happened to my first paragragh where I state the above quote is from http://insitebuilders.blogspot.com/2008/08/revit-vs-acad.html what happened to my first paragragh

where I state the above quote is from
http://insitebuilders.blogspot.com/2008/08/revit-vs-acad.html

]]> By: garydorn http://architosh.com/2008/10/autodesk-announces-64-bit-revit-platform-for-bim/comment-page-1/#comment-15 garydorn Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:46:45 +0000 http://ungkohe.pair.com/~br1t8s78/?p=261#comment-15 " BIM is not about 3D. BIM is about automatg info relationships using piece-based const models. For the const managers this means modelg both process and sequence as well as volume and sq footage." Furthermore if Apple bought Autodesk then they would inheret REVIT - YUK ” BIM is not about 3D. BIM is about automatg info relationships using piece-based const models. For the const managers this means modelg both process and sequence as well as volume and sq footage.”

Furthermore if Apple bought Autodesk then they would inheret REVIT – YUK

]]>